In terms of imperial identity, China doesn’t have a lot in common with the US or Europe. There’s never an easy answer with culture and identity, but I tried to explore the character of a diverse nation. Read more at augustusblack.com…
I’m fascinated by the progress of city maps over time. Now, a moment for disclaimers. I’m totally an amateur and all I know is what I’ve observe. Annnnyway, ignoring that, let’s check out Amsterdam during the 1300’s:
First off, this isn’t oriented north, it’s more like southwest but not quite because the perspective is warped. We’ve got that distinctive skewed perspective and a bunch of tiny buildings AND a cool old church (which was/is called Old Church in Dutch, Oldekerk). In other words, it has landmarks, little depictions of what you’ll see. It also shows the canals and surrounding farmland that will eventually become part of the city. I have no idea how accurate this map is. Did they really depict every single building in Amsterdam? Because that would be fucking awesome.
Moving on, here’s Amsterdam in 1572:
Okay, so pretty cool, the maps seem to be getting better, or at least, they’re better preserved. Let’s check out one more from the 1600’s. This is Utrecht 1652.
Alright, let’s check back in on Amsterdam and jump forward in time. One of my personal favorites of the bunch, Amsterdam 1770:
Well shit. That’s completely different. No more skewed view, no warped perspective. All neat lines, proper north/south axis, just neat everything. Six years after this map was made, the US got into an ugly (glorious?) war with Britain.
Let’s jump to the 1800’s with a map of Utrecht in 1865:
This was the end of these kinds of maps. After the 1800’s, city maps seemed to have changed. No more showing where every buildings is, just the streets and a few dots at landmarks. And why? Well, I would speculate it was urban sprawl and automobiles. Cars ruined the good ol’ days of meticulously drawing every building. Also pollution and more urban sprawl. Cars just ruined everything. Okay enough of that, let’s jump to the 20th century.
Here’s both Amsterdam and Utrecht in 1910:
I’ve seen several more of this particular style that seemed to become the standard of city maps in the early 1900’s. Four years after these maps, World War One began.
Now we have this, a modern driving map of Amsterdam:
And finally, for everyone like me who wants to see every tiny little building, I want to tell you, not all hope is lost! Here’s Utrecht now:
An earthquake in maps. I like these consistently informative and excellent posts.
The ways of mapping the effects of latest 6.1 earthquake–the largest in a quarter of a century–raise questions not only of the damages it left in its wake, or tragic human injuries, and property loss, but the web of services it disturbed. The expanse across which the quake’s rumbling was felt at 3:20 am endured only twenty seconds but seemed to last several minutes, shaking the sides of buildings and houses, waking panicked residents, and breaking 50 gas lines and 30 water mains, leaving some 10,000 without power. In ways that oddly echo the interconnectivity of communications, the quake centered in American Canyon was hard to embody or illustrate, if the measurement of the rumbling along the stretch of major faults lying along the San Andreas Fault that lies between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates was exact.
The “shake map” quickly generated by CISM revealed a quite specific concentration of incidence…
View original post 716 more words